Add Review 61 verification evidence
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,13 +5,14 @@
|
||||
"issue": 12,
|
||||
"pull_request": 13,
|
||||
"review_id": 61,
|
||||
"reviewed_head": "5e721b0ddd648f3e80f341a3c304d1cc3ca47ee8",
|
||||
"reviewed_parent_sha": "5e721b0ddd648f3e80f341a3c304d1cc3ca47ee8",
|
||||
"reviewed_head": "1b9eda683c66d3c7129716b9899eddf61df3362d",
|
||||
"implementation_parent": "b8b8811a2a50371795a02e4fa65f097c9d9508ac",
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "N01-loan-balance-definition",
|
||||
"classification": "implementation_defect",
|
||||
"status": "resolved_at_implementation_parent",
|
||||
"status": "resolved_and_verified_at_source_head",
|
||||
"root_cause": "Internal candidate writers could persist loan balance evidence without an explicit representative liability definition, and unsupported loan purposes could bypass the definition rule.",
|
||||
"tests": [
|
||||
"test_direct_loan_candidate_requires_liability_definition_and_writes_nothing",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user