Files
trex-core/tests/application/test_asset_centric_admission.py
T
genichinandClaude Opus 4.8 7d727824dc feat(slot): BAT-030 — 자산 중심 cutover 완성 (dcy-020 BAT-δ, REQ-056·057·062·064·065)
M1 literal inactive 전면화: SlotState 5-state(idle/closed 별칭 제거),
마이그레이션 010(CHECK 교체+행 rewrite), ops_checks 를 transition_log 기반 재작성.
M2 집행 매도 수량 브로커 정본(D3): dispatch 매도 qty=broker hldg_qty,
미러 fallback 없음, 브로커 0 → skip+WARN, 리스트 기반 dispatch(head-block 방지).
M3 컬럼 drop + legacy pool 제거: 마이그레이션 011(trading_date·entry_count DROP),
repo 계약 instance 스코프 개편(집행 큐 포함), preallocation 폐기(데몬 7스레드),
admission 자산 중심 단일 경로(slot_id 정본), capacity 재정의(available=M−active),
daily_symbol_entries 코드 경로 제거.
M4 cutover 도구(D1·D4): trex-core-cutover(전체 rebuild, preflight/브로커 carry-over/
--allow-unmapped/--promote-unique/dry-run) + PG 리허설 테스트 8건.
M5 baseline 마감: data-model/runtime-flows/project-structure/interface-contract
자산 중심 최종 갱신 + run-trex-core-daemon 스킬 정합.

검증: 단위 367 passed + ruff clean; PG-gated 29 passed(010/011 round-trip·드리프트
가드·cutover 리허설); RabbitMQ 21 passed; run-the-app e2e(test DB+실 MQ, M=1):
reconcile 슬롯 생성→slot_id 매수→dedup→capacity_full→fill→already_active→
매도→inactive(자산 바인딩 보존)→영구 슬롯 재활성 전 구간 green.
실 cutover 는 운영자 실행(REL 단계, D4).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 15:16:15 +09:00

102 lines
4.4 KiB
Python

"""dcy-020 / REQ-059 (BAT-028; BAT-030 단일 경로): asset-centric buy admission (FCFS·M캡·over-cap)."""
from __future__ import annotations
from trex_core.adapters.persistence.in_memory_intent_store import InMemoryIntentStore
from trex_core.application.intents import BuyIntent, IntentService
from trex_core.domain.slot import SlotService, SlotState
from trex_core.domain.slot.in_memory_repository import InMemorySlotRepository
INST = "inst-1"
# portfolio_id -> symbol (universe resolver)
_SYMS = {"pf-a": "005930", "pf-b": "000660", "pf-c": "035720"}
def _wire(max_active):
repo = InMemorySlotRepository()
svc = SlotService(repo, instance_key=INST)
intents = IntentService(
svc, repo, InMemoryIntentStore(),
resolve_symbol=lambda pid: _SYMS.get(pid),
instance_key=INST, max_active_slots=max_active,
)
return repo, svc, intents
def test_activates_asset_slot():
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a", "pf-b"})
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", portfolio_id="pf-a"))
assert d.status == "admitted"
slot = repo.find_slot_by_portfolio(INST, "pf-a")
assert slot.status is SlotState.PENDING_BUY and slot.symbol == "005930"
def test_activates_by_slot_id():
# dcy-020/REQ-061: slot_id is the canonical buy contract key.
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a"})
slot = repo.find_slot_by_portfolio(INST, "pf-a")
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", slot_id=slot.slot_id))
assert d.status == "admitted" and d.slot_id == slot.slot_id
got = repo.fetch_slot(slot.slot_id)
assert got.status is SlotState.PENDING_BUY and got.symbol == "005930" # resolved from slot.portfolio_id
def test_unknown_slot_for_bad_slot_id():
from uuid import uuid4
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a"})
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", slot_id=uuid4()))
assert d.status == "rejected" and d.reason == "unknown_slot"
def test_already_active_is_rejected():
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a", "pf-b"})
intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", portfolio_id="pf-a"))
d2 = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b2", portfolio_id="pf-a"))
assert d2.status == "rejected" and d2.reason == "already_active"
def test_capacity_full_at_M_no_eviction():
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=1)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a", "pf-b"})
d1 = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", portfolio_id="pf-a"))
assert d1.status == "admitted"
d2 = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b2", portfolio_id="pf-b"))
assert d2.status == "rejected" and d2.reason == "capacity_full"
# existing holding untouched (no eviction)
assert repo.find_slot_by_portfolio(INST, "pf-a").status is SlotState.PENDING_BUY
def test_unknown_portfolio_when_no_asset_slot():
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a"})
# pf-c is resolvable to a symbol but has no reconciled asset slot
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", portfolio_id="pf-c"))
assert d.status == "rejected" and d.reason == "unknown_portfolio"
def test_over_cap_blocks_new_keeps_existing():
# M=2: fill 2, then lower M to 1 (over-cap) -> new rejected, existing kept
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=2)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a", "pf-b", "pf-c"})
intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b1", portfolio_id="pf-a"))
intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b2", portfolio_id="pf-b"))
assert repo.count_active(INST) == 2
intents._max_active_slots = 1 # operator lowered M (over-cap)
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id="b3", portfolio_id="pf-c"))
assert d.status == "rejected" and d.reason == "capacity_full"
# both existing positions kept
assert repo.count_active(INST) == 2
def test_no_cap_admits_without_capacity_check():
# BAT-030: max_active_slots=None -> no capacity cap (asset-centric only path)
repo, svc, intents = _wire(max_active=None)
repo.reconcile_universe(INST, {"pf-a", "pf-b", "pf-c"})
for i, pid in enumerate(sorted(_SYMS)):
d = intents.submit_buy(BuyIntent(intent_id=f"b{i}", portfolio_id=pid))
assert d.status == "admitted"
assert repo.count_active(INST) == 3