37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# BAT-013 Verification
|
|
|
|
## Verification summary
|
|
|
|
Status: PASS
|
|
|
|
Evidence was collected against synthetic/temp data only. No production ledger DB mutation or real financial files were used.
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance criteria mapping
|
|
|
|
### REQ-017
|
|
- AC-1: PASS — `cross_transfer_service.py`, `reconciliation_service.py`, `assets_service.py`, `uncategorized_workbench_service.py` were created and now own their workflows.
|
|
- AC-2: PASS — service/MCP/dashboard contract remained stable; MCP discovery still reports 56 tools.
|
|
- AC-3: PASS — workflow-focused regression and full pytest both passed.
|
|
- AC-4: PASS — BAT-013 implementation/verification docs record the actual changed files, commands, and outcomes.
|
|
|
|
## Requirement state decision
|
|
|
|
- REQ-017: Implemented.
|
|
|
|
## Validation evidence
|
|
|
|
- `python3 -m py_compile jarca_ledger_mcp/application/*.py jarca_ledger_mcp/service.py` → PASS
|
|
- `pytest -q tests/test_cross_account_transfer_matching.py tests/test_asset_snapshots.py tests/test_categorization.py tests/test_contract_regression.py tests/test_service.py` → PASS (`24 passed`)
|
|
- `pytest -q` → PASS (`42 passed, 4 skipped`)
|
|
- `hermes mcp test jarca-ledger` → PASS (`Connected`, `Tools discovered: 56`)
|
|
- Python provenance check on advanced workflow exports → PASS
|
|
|
|
## Remaining issues
|
|
|
|
### Hard blockers
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
### Non-blocking follow-up
|
|
- MCP/Streamlit adapter surface narrowing
|
|
- dcy-011 baseline/final status refresh and QC evidence sync
|